Resumo

PriskriboSharon Tate in Eye Magazine, 1969 (cropped).jpg	English: American actress Sharon Tate in a press photo for the May 1969 issue of Eye Magazine. This picture was also used as a publicity photograph for her film The Wrecking Crew, released in the same year.
Dato	majo 1969
Fonto	https://simply-sharon-tate.tumblr.com/post/135653159389/sharon-tates-diet-secrets-as-reported-in-the-may / Source for the better quality picture, from Getty; https://www.gettyimages.ch/detail/nachrichtenfoto/sharon-tate-publicity-portrait-from-the-film-the-nachrichtenfoto/134193909
Aŭtoro	NekonataUnknown author
Permeso (Reuzo de la dosiero)	English: *A renewal search was done at copyright.gov using the title Eye Magazine. There were no listings for the publication; there's no evidence of continued copyright on the magazine.
Ceteraj versioj	Ĉi tiu dosiero estas eltondaĵo el alia dosiero : Sharon Tate in Eye Magazine, 1969.jpg

Permesiloj:

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart as well as a detailed definition of "publication" for public art. Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (50 p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 p.m.a.), Mexico (100 p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties. العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

"Publicity photos have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary." Film industry author Gerald Mast, in Film Study and the Copyright Law (1989) p. 87, writes:

"According to the old copyright act, such production stills were not automatically copyrighted as part of the film and required separate copyrights as photographic stills. The new copyright act similarly excludes the production still from automatic copyright but gives the film's copyright owner a five-year period in which to copyright the stills. Most studios have never bothered to copyright these stills because they were happy to see them pass into the public domain, to be used by as many people in as many publications as possible."

See also film still article, which explains that publicity photos were traditionally not copyrighted.